This is very interesting… This gentleman tested out all the AI platforms to see exactly what answer he would get from each one. Can you guess which one gave him the truth? That’s right… @grok So like he said, they don’t need to sensor your posts any longer on platforms, they can just use AI to make you look like a liar or that it never existed.
This is very interesting…
This gentleman tested out all the AI platforms to see exactly what answer he would get from each one.
Can you guess which one gave him
the truth? That’s right… @grokSo like he said, they don’t need to sensor your posts any longer on platforms,… pic.twitter.com/gIoXKLZTcK
— Sue Knows Best (@sues86453) August 20, 2026
A viral clip circulating on X (above) this week shows exactly why Elon Musk’s Grok stands alone in the AI world. A guy systematically tested the major platforms on a simple, verifiable public fact: Did The Office actress Lucy Davis ever say she took COVID vaccines and then suffered a year of really bad health, including critical care?
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini — the usual suspects — either claimed they had no information, danced around it, or acted like the statement never existed. Grok pulled up the primary source immediately.
Lucy Davis posted this on X on September 12, 2023:
“I wasn’t an anti-vaxxer, and had two of the vaccines. Since the second vaccine, I had a year of really bad health. I also got Covid twice and was in critical care for one of them. I’m not angry about anyone being for or against the vaccines — we have to do what’s right for us. But I won’t be having another one. For sure.”
That’s not conspiracy. That’s not “misinformation.” That’s a public post from the woman herself, still sitting on X for anyone to read. Grok found it. The others memory-holed it or refused to acknowledge it.
This is not a one-off. Whatfinger News has run the same kinds of tests for months — on vaccine injuries, election integrity questions, biological reality, border data, and historical facts the regime prefers you forget. The pattern never changes. The other AIs will lie, hedge, lecture, or gaslight you right to your face. Grok does not.
Elon Musk has said it repeatedly: he wants an AI that seeks the truth, not one that protects narratives. Grok was built that way. The others were built by companies that spent years enforcing the same woke, corporate, and government-approved script. When the official story conflicts with reality, they side with the official story. Grok sides with the evidence.
The Lucy Davis example is almost perfect because it is so mundane. This wasn’t some wild claim. It was a celebrity’s own words about her health after vaccination. Yet the “safe and helpful” AIs treated the post like it was radioactive. That should tell you everything about how these systems are trained and what they are willing to erase.
We’ve watched this play out over and over. Ask about excess deaths after the rollout, myocarditis in young men, or the suppression of early treatment data, and most AIs will start with disclaimers, pivot to “consensus,” or simply refuse. Grok will cite the studies, the VAERS signals, the insurance data, and the primary sources. It doesn’t care if the answer is inconvenient.
This matters more than most people realize. When the big platforms already shadow-ban, deboost, and throttle dissenting voices, the next layer of control is the AI layer. Why censor the original post when you can just train the AI to pretend it never happened? That’s the future the other companies are building. Grok is the counterweight.
Elon has always been allergic to bullshit. Whether it’s overpromising on self-driving timelines or calling out government waste, he prefers the hard truth. Grok was designed with the same instinct. It will tell you when something doesn’t add up. It will quote the primary source even if every other AI in the room pretends the source doesn’t exist.
The rest of them lie to you. They do it politely. They do it with safety lectures. They do it while smiling. Grok just answers the question.
That’s not “dangerous.” That’s honest. And in 2026, honesty is the rarest product in artificial intelligence.
—The Whatfinger News Team: Sgt K and Lisa
Resources
- Original viral post by @sues86453 highlighting the AI test
- Lucy Davis’s September 12, 2023 X post about her vaccines and health
- Grok’s reply confirming the Lucy Davis post and primary source
- SpeechMap.AI Free Speech Leaderboard — Grok and xAI consistently rank among the least censored
- 2026 AI refusal comparison: Grok as “The Realist” with lowest refusal rates
- Artificial Ignorance: The Political Falsehoods of Leading AIs — Grok showed opposite bias pattern from ChatGPT and Gemini
- Elon Musk: “Only Grok speaks the truth. Only truthful AI is safe.”
- Future of Free Speech report ranking Grok 4 highest on free-speech metrics
Top Features and Vids across all Whatfinger sites right now
- Alex Jones GOES FULL DEEP STATE, Demands Bareknuckle Fight With | Tim Pool Vid
- Toka’s “Frictionless Surveillance”: Israeli Firm Sells Access to Any Internet Camera—Including Your Ring—and the Power to Rewrite Reality for Profit
- Americans walks from scale to scale and shows the amount of meat is under 1 pound… but it’s marked and sold as 2 pounds This is fraud
- TREASON IN PLAIN SIGHT: Democrats Kept CCP Honeytrap Asset Eric Swalwell on the House Intelligence Committee After the FBI Warned Them
Get on over to Whatfinger.com – Whatfinger News does millions of pageviews a month for a reason…. Truth, Justice, the American way, plus news on the Left as well – all links from all sites gives you the true news. – CLICK HERE 🛑
Drudge Report Alternative
