The FBI may have a big problem on its hands with the Seth Rich case.

Is Ivermectin the Key to Fighting Cancer? …. – Wellness (Dr. McCullough’s company) Sponsored Post 🛑 You can get MEBENDAZOLE and Ivermectin from Wellness 👍

(Huddleston v. FBI). Last week I wrote about how the feds are trying to quash our discovery requests, but there’s a silver lining. If I’m right about the law, the FBI may soon have to release a lot of damning documents and answer a lot of really embarrassing questions (whether @FBIDirectorKash wants to or not). By way of background, the courts generally prohibit discovery in FOIA cases, but there are exceptions. I was banking on those exceptions when I submitted the FOIA requests, and I was expecting the FBI to fight me tooth and nail. The feds lived up to those expectations, but they also made a really big blunder that I didn’t notice at first: they put all of their eggs in one basket, and that basket has some really big holes in it. Several court opinions have distinguished between FOIA cases that seek specific records versus FOIA cases that seek injunctive relief for a “pattern or practice” of FOIA violations.

Discovery is typically restricted in the former type of case but not the latter. Our case has both types of claims, but our discovery is ONLY targeted at the latter claims, i.e., the type of claims where discovery is normally permitted. The FBI’s only argument for resisting discovery is that discovery should be prohibited in all FOIA cases, regardless of the circumstances. That’s a weak argument and the case law is against them, but there’s a much bigger problem. A party resisting discovery must specifically object to each and every discovery request, giving specific reasons for each objection. The FBI didn’t do that, and the law is very clear that failure to do so results in waiver of all the objections. In other words, the law says the FBI should be ordered to fully answer each and every question – and produce each and every requested document – because it failed to make specific objections.

It asserted only one general objection, and even that objection is a turd. So why does this matter? Our discovery requests are a rectal exam for the FBI, demanding documents and answers about every dirty scheme the FBI has ever employed to hide information from the public and from Congress. This is stuff that Senator @ChuckGrassley has been trying to get his hands on for years. I’ve posted the discovery requests below. I’ve also posted our motion to compel the FBI to comply with discovery, and I encourage my colleagues to grade my homework and let me know whether they think my analysis is right. Finally, a few words about @Kash_Patel . People who know him tell me he’s a great guy, and I believe them. I’d probably enjoy hanging out with him and we would probably be friends, but here’s the problem: I have a lot of friends who don’t need to be director of the FBI. It’s painfully clear that Kash is in over his head and he’s not getting the job done. I’ve been fighting the FBI’s dirty tricks for nine years (in multiple lawsuits), and you know what has changed since Kash took over? Not very much. The FBI is still playing dirty, and the deep state is just biding its time until the Democrats regain power. Kash had his chance, and now it’s time for a change.

@realDonaldTrump @DAGToddBlanch Response to FBI’s motion for a protective order: lawflog.com/wp-content/upl Discovery requests to the FBI: lawflog.com/wp-content/upl

General Flynn: FOIA is the necessary and legal equivalent of a rectal exam for a patient. The latter is designed to help a proctologist get to the “bottom” of the problem while the former is designed to bring transparency to the nation. Thank you for your work on this important set of issues and best of luck exposing the truth.

It’s an unsolved murder. It’s fascinating that any bureaucrat can claim that there is any reason to keep any document about the case private. For example: There’s a video of the murderers (plural) running away from the crime scene, yet that video hasn’t been made public. MCN
Great work. FOIA is there for a reason. A very important one. I filed one with the DOD. They refused it based on privacy of individuals involved. A community’s health is not as important as a public servants’ identity?

There was no botched robbery. It was a hit. Seth Rich was murdered in cold blood because he exposed the truth. Podesta even agreed in an email that he was for “making an example” out of the DNC leaker, and a former NSA employee proved that the leak did come from inside the DNC because of the way the data was stored and the unique coding through the Metadata. The question remains, “Were the Clintons and Mueller responsible for the assassination of Seth Rich?” By the looks of these emails, it appears that they most likely were.

Were the Clintons and Robert Mueller responsible for the assassination of Seth Rich?

Declassified emails seem to solidify this conclusion. pic.twitter.com/U0vq7FMxgL

— The SCIF (@TheSCIF) March 22, 2026