FOUR STUDIES CONFIRM SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME FROM VACCINATION IS REAL
When studies find a link between vaccines and death, the Journal Cartel DELETES them:
1. MILLER: 1,048 SIDS cases identified in VAERS; 75% occurred within a week of vaccination.
2. HULSCHER ET AL:… https://t.co/jVVPFuteAy pic.twitter.com/HYfdBdgZzj
— Nicolas Hulscher, MPH (@NicHulscher) June 25, 2026
When studies find a link between vaccines and death, the Journal Cartel DELETES them: 1. MILLER: 1,048 SIDS cases identified in VAERS; 75% occurred within a week of vaccination. 2. HULSCHER ET AL: Hundreds of infant and toddler deaths within weeks of MMR vaccination identified in VAERS; 24% were classified as SIDS. 3. HOOKER ET AL: Louisiana Department of Health death records show infants vaccinated at 2 months are 68% MORE LIKELY TO DIE in the following month than unvaccinated infants; girls had 112% higher odds. 4. GOLDMAN ET AL: Vaccines likely cause SIDS via BRAINSTEM FAILURE; immature infant livers fail to clear toxic vaccine ingredients—triggering inflammation and brainstem dysfunction that can lead to sudden death during sleep. Then the censorship began. Miller’s study was REMOVED from the scientific record FIVE YEARS after publication following anonymous “post-publication concerns.” Our MMR vaccine death study was REMOVED from ResearchGate for posing “a threat to public security or public health.” Hooker’s study was REMOVED from PrePrints without ANY explanation. Science isn’t supposed to disappear because the findings are inconvenient. It’s time to invoke the RICO Act against the Journal Cartel.
Secretary Kennedy
I sent this letter to the Editor-in-Chief of Toxicology Reports demanding a full explanation for the removal of a published article examining vaccines and sudden infant death. Americans have a right to know why scientific papers are removed, who made those decisions, what evidence supported them, and whether the same standards are applied consistently. We will restore trust in public health by insisting on transparency, accountability, and open scientific inquiry—not by asking the public to accept decisions behind closed doors.
