Click here to read Constitutional attorney Matt DePerno’s Memorandum on states CAN decertify!
https://wendyrogers.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Memo-Re-Decertification-092321.pdf
Email my office and tell me what county of Wisconsin you live in for directions on next steps for the REAL audit and decertification…
rep.ramthun@legis.wi.gov
Please review Rep Ramthun’s “Let There Be Light #3” press release, along with the following data attached to further validate the information it presents.
1 Troupis Supreme Court Case: This is the ruling on the Supreme Court Case that Donald Trump filed after the 2020 election. While it came to a 4-3 decision where the majority ruled against Trump largely due to “laches” and “disenfranchisement”, it is very telling that the 3 dissenting Supreme Court Justices all largely agreed with each other that many of the same laws were broken. What is even more telling is the lawsuits and investigations since all reflect many of these same laws with additional evidence.
These dissentions begin on page 34 of the document. While it is highly recommended to read the document in its entirety, the following largely points out Supreme Court Justice Rebecca Bradley’s dissent:
- a) 69 Speaks at the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) possesses no authority to prescribe the manner of conducting elections; rather, this legislatively-created body is supposed to administer and enforce Wisconsin’s election laws. Wis. Stat. §§ 5.05(1) and (2m).
- b) 69 “A guidance document does not have the force of law.” Wis. Stat. § 227.112(3). WEC’s guidance documents are merely “communications about the law—they are not the law itself.”
- c) 69 notes that “During oral arguments in this case, Justice Jill J. Karofsky made the following statement (among others) to the President’s attorney: ‘You want us to overturn this election so that your king can stay in power, and that is so un-American.’ When a justice displays such overt political bias, the public’s confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary is destroyed.”
- d) 69-70 Chapters 5 through 12 of the Wisconsin Statutes contain the state’s enacted election laws. Section 5.01(1) states that “except as otherwise provided, chs. 5 to 12 shall be construed to give effect to the will of the electors, if that can be ascertained from the proceedings, notwithstanding informality or failure to fully comply with some of their provisions.” This substantial compliance provision does not apply to absentee balloting procedures, however: “Notwithstanding s. 5.01(1), with respect to matters relating to the absentee ballot process, ss. 6.86, 6.87(3) to (7) and 9.01(1)(b) 2. and 4. shall be construed as mandatory. Ballots cast in contravention of the procedures specified in those provisions may not be counted. Ballots counted in contravention of the procedures specified in those provisions may not be included in the certified result of any election.” Wis. Stat. § 6.84(2)
- e) 70 “The legislature finds that voting is a constitutional right, the vigorous exercise of which should be strongly encouraged. In contrast, voting by absentee ballot is a privilege exercised wholly outside the traditional safeguards of the polling place. The legislature finds that the privilege of voting by absentee ballot must be carefully regulated to prevent the potential for fraud or abuse; to prevent overzealous solicitation of absent electors who may prefer not to participate in an election; to prevent undue influence on an absent elector to vote for or against a candidate or to cast a particular vote in a referendum; or other similar abuses.” Wis. Stat. § 6.84(1)
- f) 74 speaks at Wis. Stat. § 6.87(6d) and Wis. Stat. § 6.87(9)
- g) 79 Supreme Court Justice Rebecca Bradley correctly predicts where we are today when she concludes her dissent by saying, “The majority’s failure to act leaves an indelible stain on our most recent election. It will also profoundly and perhaps irreparably impact all local, statewide, and national elections going forward, with grave consequence to the State of Wisconsin and significant harm to the rule of law. Petitioners assert troubling allegations of noncompliance with Wisconsin’s election laws by public officials on whom the voters rely to ensure free and fair elections. It is our solemn judicial duty to say what the law is. The majority’s failure to discharge its duty perpetuates violations of the law by those entrusted to administer it. I dissent.”
2 Wec vs mueller: This lawsuit is referenced due to its merits on finding connections in organizations affiliated with the drop box effort in Wisconsin’s 2020 election, also provides further evidence specific to ss 6.87(6) mentioned in the Troupis case.
- a) 17 #30 According to the Wisconsin Election Commission’s website “look-up” there was over 500 ballot drop boxes sites around the State after August 19, 2020. See Exhibit #14. There were 15 drop boxes in Milwaukee alone, 13 of which were at libraries. A law to make the use of these designated drop sites a legal means of voting in Wisconsin was never enacted. Rather, according to the absent voting procedure found in Wis. Stat. 6.87(6).
3 Kaardal – WI General Assembly Elections and Campaigns Presentation: This presentation very accurately reflects how the actions taken by the CTCL and WEC broke ss 12.11 which is entitled “election bribery”. It looks into the Wisconsin Voting Plan, and provides supporting evidence to reveal the infusion of money into our elections is against Wisconsin law.
- a) 3 cites ss. 12.11
- b) 26-29 provide a legal analysis of the presentation to state that it is very clear the use of CTCL money breaks WI law.
4 Lawsuits in the “WI 5”: Below are links (a-e) to each of the lawsuits against the WEC in the major 5 cities where the greatest amounts of CTCL money was infused into elections. Each of them provide additional evidence and cite WEC has broken ss. 5.05(1) just the Troupis case, as well as ss. 7.15(1) under the “Statement of Facts” section of each lawsuit. The links (f-j) represent the appeals cases for 12.11 election bribery recently filed on January 6th.
- a)https://legis.wisconsin.gov/assembly/22/brandtjen/media/1489/milwaukee-lawsuit.pdf
- b) https://legis.wisconsin.gov/assembly/22/brandtjen/media/1488/racine-lawsuit.pdf
- c)https://legis.wisconsin.gov/assembly/22/brandtjen/media/1470/kenosha-lawsuit.pdf
- d)https://legis.wisconsin.gov/assembly/22/brandtjen/media/1467/wisconsin-elections-commission-complaint-egk-pdf (Green Bay)
- e) https://legis.wisconsin.gov/assembly/22/brandtjen/media/1490/madison-lawsuit.pdf
- f)https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nfwv3ycntgDQNBZlxCNfhvq0YHS4cpiw/view (Kenosha appeal)
- g)https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ySfvggB0jqIf7TxPC3wVOfWKh1l9l6qs/view (Green Bay appeal)
- h) https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-1JatOZWHEfBDo1v3RSJSFOudQGAtcbJ/view (Milwaukee appeal)
- i)https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Gh4YFNn7EtgfamF4c5RT7iXSdY5IjerL/view (Racine appeal)
- j)https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-yamr7AD5-JcynDC-fmXDnetuPgJFBMG/view (Madison appeal)
5 Racine County Sheriff: This investigation provides irrefutable evidence with documentation as well as video files that capture the WEC admitting to knowingly breaking WI election laws. It strengthens the Troupis case claims with further evidence of the WEC breaking ss. 6.84 and ss. 6.875. It also reveals by admitting they were aware of breaking the law, it infringed on ss. 12.13 which is entitled “election fraud.”
- a) 9 refers to ss. 6.84
- b) 10 and 11 refer to ss. 6.875
- c) 29 refers to ss. 12.13
- d)For video evidence watch section two of Ramthun Report 36 by clicking here: https://rumble.com/vp7t9d-ramthun-report-episode-36-proof-wi-election-was-fraud.html
- e) To review the presentation in full, please view the 11/10/21 Assembly Campaign and elections committee hearing. visit https://wiseye.org/2021/11/10/assembly-committee-on-campaigns-and-elections-21/ (You may need to create an account)
We highly encourage sharing this content with as many as possible, so we can increase awareness of where we are, and what’s to come. For those looking to help us in this effort, please use the press releases, videos, and attached evidence to help us gain support from your Representatives and Senators. Together we can shed some light into the dark corners.
Let there be light.
